At the meeting of the Cochrane Collaboration Steering Group (CCSG) in October 2006 it was agreed that publication of Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews (and protocols) in The Cochrane Library would require the approval of both the Cochrane Review Group (CRG) and a Diagnostic test accuracy editorial team (DTA ET). This would be implemented by requiring joint sign-off of protocols and reviews by a CRG Editor and a DTA Editor. The CCSG decided that the DTA ET should be answerable to the Publishing Policy Group.
The DTA ET will assure the quality of the methodology and methodological reporting of the review; the CRG will assure the quality of the clinical aspects and reporting of the review. Both will achieve this by using parallel peer review processes.
The members of the DTA ET will consist of methodologists, epidemiologists, statisticians and clinicians with knowledge of the methodology of diagnostic research, research synthesis of diagnostic test accuracy studies, and who are familiar with the content of the Cochrane Diagnostic Review author’s Handbook.
Key roles of the DTA ET are:
The membership of the DTA ET will include editors, associate editors, team members (appointed by the Publishing Policy Group) and a team manager.
The editors will take responsibility for the comprehensiveness and quality of peer review, correspondence with the CRG editor and author(s), the quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy, and sign-off for publication of review and protocol for methodological quality (in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy).
Associate editors will work in the same manner as editors, except that they will defer to an editor for final sign-off on the publication of protocols and reviews.
Team Members will undertake regular peer review of protocols and reviews, and address questions raised by proposed review titles.
The Team Manager will act as the initial point of contact for CRGs with new reviews and protocols, and will support the editors in managing and developing the peer review process, the distribution of work, identifying peer reviewers, and maintaining required databases and records.